Does the CRT AutoAdapt algorithm improve acute hemodynamic and electrical parameters compared to echocardiography-guided optimization and standard programming in CRT-defibrillator recipients?
The automated CRT AutoAdapt algorithm provides acute hemodynamic and electrical improvements comparable to resource-intensive echocardiographic optimization, and significantly outperforms standard out-of-the-box programming.
ABSTRACTBackground A considerable proportion of heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prolonged QRS duration fail to respond adequately to Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) delay programming is a key factor leading to diminished response. Objective To acutely correlate aortic velocity time integral (AoVTI), LVEF, and QRS duration with three programming strategies in the post-implantation setting: AV delay automatically set by a novel CRT AutoAdapt algorithm, AV delay optimized by echocardiography, and standard (‘in-box') programming. Methods Under normal intrinsic AV conduction (Results With the default 70% AV adaptation, the CRT AutoAdapt automatically set similar AV delay (117.1±23.9 ms) compared to echocardiography-guided optimization (118.3±30.2 ms, p=0.94). Strong concordance was observed between the algorithm and echocardiographic optimization for AoVTI (concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) and LVEF (0.93). Both optimization methods significantly outperformed standard AV programming for LVEF improvement (pConclusion Acute hemodynamic effects of CRT AutoAdapt and echocardiographic AV delay optimization were similar, with equivalent cardiac performance. This device-based approach offers the potential advantage of continuous adaptation to changing physiological conditions without requiring resource-intensive in-office optimization procedures.
García-Fernández et al. (Sun,) studied this question.