Artificial Intelligence in Cadastre: A Systematic Review of Methods, Applications, and Trends

Surveying and register administration are core to land administration, and accordingly, land surveying and registration are essential to socio-economic development due to their potential accuracy and efficiency. Until now, customary land surveying and registration have relied on human input, which is a situation that undermines efficiency and is prone to errors in data handling. During the last decade, the exponential growth in artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), has provided new methodologies that can overcome these deficiencies. This review examines AI in cadastral management by analyzing technical solutions and trends across three areas including data collection, modeling, and common applications. This review aims to provide a comprehensive survey of the current use of AI in cadastral management to the extent of defining a future research avenue. Based on the comprehensive review of literature, this study has reached the following three conclusions. (1) Automated extraction of parcel boundaries has been achieved through deep learning in data collection and processing, removing the bottlenecks of manual interpretation. Models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformers have been used for pixel-level semantic segmentation of high-resolution remote sensing images, leading to significant improvements in efficiency and accuracy. (2) Non-spatial data have been processed with natural language processing techniques to automatically extract information and construct relationships, thus overcoming the limitations of paper-based archives and traditional relational databases. (3) Deep learning models have been applied to automatically detect parcel changes and to enable integrated analysis of spatial and non-spatial data, which has supported the transition of cadastral management from two-dimensional to three-dimensional. However, several challenges remain, including differences in multi-temporal data processing, spatial semantic ambiguity, and the lack of large-scale, high-quality annotated data. Future research can focus on improving model generalization, advancing cross-modal data fusion, and providing recommendations for the development of a reliable and practical intelligent cadastral system.