PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

AICOS®: Decision Authority Infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence Governance

View Full Paper
YKYASIN KALAFATOGLU

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a governance-first infrastructure that manages decision authority in AI systems.
  • Introduced AICOS® as a new architectural layer for AI governance.
  • Defined a decision pipeline incorporating governance constraints.
  • Integrated governance mechanisms including risk evaluation and determinism.
  • Developed formal representations for decision uncertainty and irreversible outcomes.
  • Proposed Decision Authority Infrastructure as a solution for accountable AI decisions.
  • Demonstrated the importance of governance mechanisms for safe AI deployment.
  • Highlighted the need for traceable and auditable AI processes.

Abstract

This paper introduces AICOS® (Artificial Intelligence Control and Oversight System), a governance-first technological architecture designed to manage decision authority in artificial intelligence systems. While modern artificial intelligence research has focused primarily on model capability, computational performance, and data scale, the governance of AI-assisted decision processes remains an unresolved structural challenge. As AI systems become embedded in critical infrastructures such as finance, healthcare, energy systems, and public governance, the need for accountable decision mechanisms becomes increasingly important. This research proposes the concept of Decision Authority Infrastructure as a new architectural layer within artificial intelligence systems. The proposed infrastructure operates between AI models and real-world execution environments and ensures that AI-generated outputs are validated through governance constraints before influencing operational decisions. The AICOS® architecture integrates several governance mechanisms, including uncertainty thresholds, decision risk evaluation, irreversibility analysis, deterministic decision replay, and human-final authority enforcement. These mechanisms enable transparent, auditable, and institutionally aligned decision processes. Mathematically, the decision pipeline is defined as a structured transformation from data inputs to final actions under governance constraints. The framework models decision authority as a constrained optimization process and introduces formal representations for decision uncertainty, decision risk, and irreversible outcomes. The paper argues that the next phase of global artificial intelligence deployment will require governance-native infrastructure capable of ensuring safe, accountable, and traceable AI-assisted decisions. Decision Authority Infrastructure represents a foundational step toward integrating institutional authority structures directly into artificial intelligence systems. The AICOS® framework contributes a new perspective to AI governance research by proposing a technological infrastructure that bridges artificial intelligence capabilities with institutional decision authority. This work aims to stimulate further research on governance-native AI architectures and decision accountability mechanisms in advanced artificial intelligence systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

YASIN KALAFATOGLU (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70f8531e4c4a9ff5b49fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18862734
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper