What does this research mean for the field?

The microscopic transorbital approach offers distinct anatomical exposure characteristics compared to the mini-pterional approach for MCA bifurcation aneurysms. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare the microscopic transorbital approach and the mini-pterional approach for MCA bifurcation aneurysms based on anatomical exposure.

synapse

⌘+K

synapse

⌘+K

March 8, 2026

Microscopic transorbital vs mini-pterional approach to MCA bifurcation aneurysms: a quantitative cadaveric comparative study with surgical implications.

Key Points

To compare the microscopic transorbital approach and the mini-pterional approach for MCA bifurcation aneurysms based on anatomical exposure.
Conducted a cadaveric comparative study
Assessed anatomical exposure characteristics
Evaluated surgical maneuverability of both approaches
Mini-pterional approach provides broader exposure and maneuverability
Microscopic transorbital approach offers distinct anatomical insights
Findings may influence surgical decision-making in MCA bifurcation cases

Abstract

The MP approach remains advantageous for broader exposure and maneuverability; however, the microscopic TOA offers distinct anatomical exposure characteristics. These findings define the geometric differences between the two routes and may inform surgical planning in selected MCA bifurcation aneurysm cases.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gülsuna et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada90bbc08abd80d5bc68d https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-026-06821-7

Bookmark

View Full Paper