PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Axiomatic Governance for Agentic AI: A Five-Layer Constitutional Framework Derived from First Principles and Validated in Production

View Full Paper
HHHao-Tse Hsieh

Key Points

  • This work aims to create a robust governance framework for agentic AI systems based on fundamental principles.
  • Developed ORISMION, a five-layer axiomatic governance framework.
  • Derivation of rules from a single objective function: survival maximization.
  • Applied formal proofs to establish architectural dimensions.
  • Validated framework in a production SaaS environment with extensive testing.
  • Integrated insights from multiple governance frameworks to enhance rule set.
  • Established a verifiable layered structure for API endpoints.
  • Expanded from 28 to 33 governance rules without new dimensions.
  • Documented collaboration process between a non-technical founder and AI agents.

Abstract

Agentic AI systems—capable of autonomous planning, reasoning, and execution—are transi- tioning from prototypes to production deployment, yet existing governance frameworks provide prescriptive checklists without formal derivation: they specify what rules to follow but not why those rules are necessary or independent of one another. We present ORISMION, a five-layer axiomatic governance framework that derives all rules from a single objective function (survival maximization) through explicit inference chains grounded in thermodynamics, control theory, and epistemology. The framework identifies three irreducible architectural dimensions—cognitive (Ω), engineering (Σ), and governance (Γ)—established through six formal proofs, and enforces their recursive self-similarity at the code level: every API endpoint must exhibit a verifiable layered structure mapping directly to the axiomatic hierarchy. Validated in a production SaaS environment (309 automated tests, 28 architecture decision records, 18 FATAL-level rules), the framework’s extensibility was further tested through principled integration of insights from four frontier frameworks (GaaS, IMDA MGF, TRiSM, HAIG), expanding from 28 to 33 defense rules without requiring new architectural dimensions. The construction process itself—in which a non-technical founder and multiple AI agents collaboratively derived the formal framework— constitutes a documented case study in human-AI co-construction of governance institutions. We publicly release the theoretical framework and selected decision records; implementation-specific materials remain proprietary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hao-Tse Hsieh (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95a470916d39fea4d6e2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18911159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Safe and Reliable Artificial Intelligence Production Deployment System2026
  2. 2Project 69: A Self-Governed Artificial Intelligence Framework2026
  3. 3Relational Constants as AI Governance Architecture: The Syzygy Rosetta Framework2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Intrinsic Reliability and Robustness for Hyper-Complex Agentic AI Systems -- Solution Outline: Architecture and Strategy2026
  5. 5CODE AFTER Law, Accounting, and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence2026