What does this research mean for the field?

There are sex-specific disparities in the prevalence of isolated intermediate hyperglycaemic states. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

March 13, 2026Diabetic Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

View Full Paper

Sex‐specific differences in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia states: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

LCLouise CooperWellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science IPIan PorterUniversity of Exeter CMClaire MeekUniversity of Leicester

Key Points

The study aims to examine sex-specific differences in the prevalence of intermediate hyperglycaemia states.
Conducted a systematic review
Performed a meta-analysis of existing data
Analyzed sex-specific prevalence rates
Identified significant disparities in prevalence between sexes
Reported implications for diagnosis in primary care
Highlighted potential ascertainment bias in research and policy

Abstract

There are sex-specific disparities in the prevalence of different isolated intermediate hyperglycaemic states, which may contribute to underdiagnosis and undertreatment in primary care and introduce ascertainment bias into research and policy.

问 AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cooper et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab4c02a1e69014ccc00c https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70293

问 AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper