PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Nonadherence to LLT associated with higher healthcare resource utilization and costs in a large integrated healthcare delivery system in Southern California

View Full Paper
MMMatthew T. MeffordRJRachelle A JuanTHTeresa N. Harrison

Key Points

  • To evaluate the relationship between adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and healthcare costs among adults with cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Examined LLT adherence trajectories using group-based trajectory modeling over 12 months.
  • Calculated all-cause and ASCVD-related annualized adjusted costs from 2015 to 2023.
  • Analyzed cost differences based on LLT adherence and LDL-C levels.
  • High LLT adherence is associated with lower all-cause costs by approximately $999.
  • Adults missing follow-up LDL-C measures incur $8312 higher all-cause costs compared to those with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL.
  • Cost differences in adherence were notable across various ASCVD risk subgroups.

Abstract

Guideline-recommended lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) can reduce healthcare utilization and costs for patients with and at-risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We examined healthcare utilization and associated costs among adult LLT users in Kaiser Permanente Southern California ≥21 years of age having ASCVD or intermediate (≥7. 5% to <20%) or high (≥20%) 10-year ASCVD risk between 2015 and 2021. LLT adherence trajectories were determined using group-based trajectory modeling over 12 months. All-cause and ASCVD-related annualized adjusted costs were calculated through 2023. High versus low LLT adherence was associated with lower all-cause costs (−999; 95% CI: −1100, −897) and varied across subgroups by ASCVD risk. Adults missing a follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measure had +8312 (95% CI +7955, +8669) higher all-cause costs compared to adults with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. Improving LDL-C management through optimized LLT treatment strategies can reduce economic burdens in high-risk patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mefford et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac0a02a1e69014ccd59fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahjo.2026.100751
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment Patterns and Healthcare-Related Costs in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Insights from a Large US Healthcare Insurer2026
  2. 2Temporal trends in lipid-lowering therapy utilization among ASCVD patients: a large-scale database analysis2025
  3. 3Missed Opportunities to Intensify Lipid‐Lowering Therapy in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Adherence to Lipid‐Lowering Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis2025
  5. 5Statin intensity, prescribing patterns, and LDL‑C reduction following ACS and in CCD patients who underwent PCI in a tertiary care setting2026