PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026National Journal of Clinical Anatomy0 citationsOpen Access

Introducing a Vertically Integrated Teaching Module in Anatomy for Undergraduate Medical Students

View Full Paper
NANiyati AiranADAnil Kumar Dwivedi

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of a vertically integrated teaching module in anatomy for medical students.
  • Observational cross-sectional study conducted with 150 phase one MBBS students and 36 faculties.
  • Two anatomy topics taught traditionally and two using vertical integration.
  • Feedback collected through a prevalidated questionnaire on a Likert scale.
  • Data analyzed statistically using a binomial test with significance threshold at P < 0.05.
  • 97% of students found the vertically integrated method more comprehensive.
  • Students reported better knowledge correlation with clinical conditions.
  • 86% of faculties acknowledged the usefulness of the method.
  • Most faculties found the sessions time-consuming and wanted improved coordination between departments.
  • 81% of faculties expressed concerns about faculty shortages affecting implementation.

Abstract

Background: Vertical integration is an alternative technique to the traditional method of teaching–learning and has been implemented as part of competency based medical education curriculum. It helps learner to correlate knowledge gained from basic medical sciences to understand different clinical conditions. So, an effort was made to introduce vertically integrated teaching module in Anatomy for undergraduate medical students. Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study was undertaken on 150 phase one MBBS students and 36 faculties. Two topics of Anatomy were taught by traditional method and another two topics by vertical integration. Thereafter, feedback was taken from students and faculties through a prevalidated questionnaire on a Likert scale. The data was then analyzed statistically using a binomial test with P -value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Ninety seven percent students found the vertically integrated method more comprehensive. They were better able to correlate knowledge of Anatomy with different clinical conditions. They also wanted to have similar sessions in the future. Similarly, 86% of faculties acknowledged its usefulness. However, most of them found conducting these sessions as time consuming and 81% of them perceived the requirement of greater coordination between different departments. They also expressed their concern about faculty shortage, which could be a major hindrance for its effective implementation. Conclusion: This study indicates that the vertically integrated teaching method is a better alternative than the traditional method, as has been perceived by students as well as faculties. However, faculties were apprehensive regarding time constraint and shortage of manpower to manage extra workload during coordination and conduct of these sessions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Airan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac1d02a1e69014ccd826https://doi.org/10.4103/njca.njca_170_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The development of diagnostic competence1996 · 236 citations
  2. 2Basic Biomedical Sciences and the Future of Medical Education: Implications for Internal Medicine2009 · 44 citations
  3. 3The effectiveness of integrated teaching over traditional teaching among first year MBBS students: A preliminary Study2013 · 22 citations
  4. 4Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum2007 · 804 citations
  5. 5Attitudes and views of medical students toward anatomy learnt in the preclinical phase at King Khalid University2012 · 18 citations