PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

The Hermeneutical Dimension of Bible Translation—A Study of Rendering Ruth 1 in Two Bantu Languages of South-Eastern Africa

View Full Paper
EWErnst R. Wendland

Key Points

  • This study examines the role of hermeneutics in Bible translation, focusing on cultural interpretation challenges.
  • Overview of hermeneutics from an evangelical perspective
  • Synthesis of core translation principles related to hermeneutics
  • Comparative case study of Ruth 1 in Chichewa and Citonga, applying discourse-linguistic and literary rhetorical analysis.
  • Culture-bound norms can reframe meaning in translation
  • Exegetically-based contextualization is crucial over transculturation
  • Implications for translation teams include prioritizing mother-tongue reviewers and utilizing paratext to reduce misreadings.

Abstract

Bible translation is an inherently hermeneutical act because meaning must be construed across two languages and cultures—the biblical source and a contemporary receptor community. I argue that Bible translation constitutes a distinctive intercultural-translational paradigm of hermeneutics in its own right, and that robust, evangelical hermeneutics essentially requires mother- tongue participation to surface and resolve culture- bound interpretive challenges. This study highlights how local receptor norms pertaining to language and culture can subtly reframe meaning and shows why careful, exegetically-based contextualization—rather than transculturation—is necessary. The study proceeds in three stages: First, a concise overview is given of hermeneutics from an evangelical perspective. Second, a synthesis of core translation principles as applied to hermeneutics is supplied. Third, a practical comparative case study of Ruth 1 in two Bantu languages (Chichewa and Citonga) is supplied, one that draws on discourse-linguistic and literary rhetorical analysis coupled with rigorous audience-checking procedures. This offers a worked example of hermeneutics-in-action that strengthens both interpretive discipline and communicative fidelity. The conclusion distills implications for African translation teams: prioritize trained mother-tongue reviewers, design supportive paratext to pre-empt predictable misreadings, and utilize repeated testing to align exegetical intent with receptor apprehension. In sum, translation is not an afterthought to biblical hermeneutics but its crucible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ernst R. Wendland (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9fb18185d8a3980244dhttps://doi.org/10.54725/conspectus.2025.2.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mother Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics within the Context of African Biblical Hermeneutics: It’s Origin, Trends and Challenges2024
  2. 2Assessing the Mode of Biblical Interpretation in the Light of African Biblical Hermeneutics: The Case of the Mother-Tongue Biblical Interpretation in Ghana2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Sacred Text, Human Choices: An Ethics of Difference for Bible Translation2026
  4. 4Revelation, Interpretation, and the Challenge of English Bible Translation2025
  5. 5Dialogues across Languages: Hermeneutic Perspectives on Interpreting Multilingual Conversations2024