PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Istoriya0 citations

The Communist Party of Western Ukraine and the Comintern: a Discussion about National Deviationists in 1927

View Full Paper
TMTanya Melnichenko

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the debate within the KPZU regarding A. Ya. Shumsky's criticisms of Ukrainization and its consequences.
  • Analysis of meeting documents from the Ukrainian Commission of the Comintern in August 1927
  • Examination of the positions held by KPZU members
  • Review of historical context on Ukrainization and Communist party dynamics
  • A. Ya. Shumsky's stance was labeled as national deviation, leading to a major split in the KPZU.
  • Members of the Vasilkov-Turyansky group were expelled from the KPZU by early 1928.
  • The debate over the KPZU became a matter of international significance, strengthening Comintern oversight.

Abstract

This article examines the debate that arose at the meeting of the Ukrainian Commission of the Comintern on the Communist Party of Western Ukraine (KPZU) from August 23 to 27, 1927. The majority of the KPZU Central Committee supported A. Ya. Shumsky, a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine (Bolsheviks) of Ukraine, the Executive Committee of the Comintern, and the Peoples Commissar of Education of the Ukrainian SSR (1924—1927), who had criticized the ongoing policy of Ukrainization in 1926. The position of Shumsky and the majority of the KPZU Central Committee (Maximovich, Vasilkov, and Turyansky) was characterized as a “national deviation”, and a split occurred within the party in early 1928 against this backdrop. Representatives of the Vasilkov-Turyansky group were expelled from the KPZU. At the same time, the question of the Communist Party of Western Ukraine acquired international significance. The condemnation of the “majority” group by the Ukrainian Commission of the ECCI on the issue of the KPZU allowed the leadership of the Comintern, the CP(b)U and the CPP to establish stricter control over the activities of the KPZU in such a complex region as Western Ukraine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanya Melnichenko (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fcbdb39f7826a300d74dhttps://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840037438-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Liquidation of the Ukrainian Communist Party 1925–20252025
  2. 2Reform of the system of national party education in the 1930s. Based on the materials of the Communist University of the National Minorities of the West.2025
  3. 3STRIKES AND SABOTAGE ACTIONS IN WESTERN UKRAINE (1926–1929): DIPLOMATIC AND MILITARY-POLITICAL CONTEXTS OF SOVIET INFLUENCE ON THE POLISH STATE2025
  4. 4The CPY/LCYugoslavia, the CPChina, All-Union Communist Party(B)/CPSU in the international communist movement (1945-1957)2025
  5. 5Proletkult, Ukrainization and Ukrainian Culture.2025