PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 16, 2026BMC Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Surface-guided radiation therapy combined with real-time position management-guided deep inspiratory breath-hold radiotherapy for left breast cancer

HGHailiang GuoHXHuaying XieCJChunling Jiang

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of combining SGRT with RPM-guided DIBH in treating left breast cancer.
  • Twenty patients with left breast cancer were randomly assigned to SGRT and SGRT + RPM groups.
  • Setup and execution times were recorded and analyzed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
  • Residual setup errors and dose reconstructions were computed to evaluate radiation delivery accuracy.
  • SGRT + RPM resulted in shorter setup times compared to SGRT alone (p < 0.05).
  • No significant differences in 6D setup errors or OAR doses were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05).
  • Significant decreases in the clinical target volume dose metrics were noted, maintaining acceptable coverage criteria.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) combined with real-time position management (RPM)-guided deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy for left breast cancer. Twenty patients diagnosed with breast cancer, who underwent breast-conserving surgery and subsequent DIBH radiotherapy, were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: SGRT-guided (SGRT); and combined SGRT + RPM-guided (SGRT + RPM). Recorded setup and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) validation execution Time (T1), Beam delivery time (T2). Residual vertical setup error (VRT Error), six-dimensional (6D) setup errors, and breath-hold error (BH Error) were obtained using breath hold CBCT. Correlations between BH Error and VRT Error were analyzed. Dose reconstruction was performed using velocity-generated adaptive CT to compute per-fraction and accumulated doses, with coefficient of variation (CV) analysis used to quantify interfractional dose variations in clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The mean (± SD) T1 and T2 times for the SGRT and SGRT + RPM groups were 452.53 ± 83.57 s vs. 299.58 ± 53.52 s (p 0.05), respectively, with no statistical difference in 6D setup errors (p > 0.05). The SGRT group exhibited a mean BH Error that was 0.4 mm larger than that of the SGRT + RPM group, with a 0.7 mm reduction in stability. There was a correlation between BH Error and VRT Error in the SGRT group (r = 0.635, p 0.05). There was no significant difference in CV values between the two groups (p > 0.05). The DIBH guided by SGRT + RPM simplify the radiotherapy workflow, improve the operation efficiency and breath-hold (BH) quality of patients. Simultaneously, it guaranteed alignment of the cumulative doses received by the CTV and OARs with the planned doses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b79df38166e15b153ab176https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15846-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer2013 · 4,013 citations
  2. 2Interfractional variation in whole-breast VMAT irradiation: a dosimetric study with complementary SGRT and CBCT patient setup2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?2019 · 106 citations
  4. 4Assessment of the use of synthetic CT produced by deformable image registration of planning CT and CBCT in adaptive radiotherapy treatments of head and neck cancers2025 · 4 citations
  5. 5Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Modern Treatment Era: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial From China2020 · 117 citations