PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Foods6 citationsOpen Access

Processing-Induced Modifications of Camel Milk Immunoglobulins and Lactoferrin: Implications for Immunocompromised Pediatric Populations and Therapeutic Applications

View Full Paper
OAOmar A. AlhajMIMohammed O. IbrahimNENour Amin Elsahoryi

Key Points

  • To explore how processing affects camel milk immunoglobulins and lactoferrin, focusing on implications for immunocompromised pediatric populations.
  • Systematic evaluation of thermal and non-thermal processing technologies
  • Assessment of alterations in molecular structure and biological function of immunoglobulins and lactoferrin
  • Review of safety measures for immunocompromised children
  • Processing can degrade bioactive proteins in camel milk
  • High-pressure processing and fermentation maintain bioactivity while ensuring safety
  • Significant knowledge gaps exist regarding structure-function relationships of processed camel milk proteins

Abstract

Immunocompromised pediatric populations (children with inborn errors of immunity, HIV infection, and cancer, as well as those undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation) have severe nutritional challenges, with malnutrition depending on the underlying condition. Camel milk (CM) represents a culturally accessible, high-quality nutritional parameter and functional food naturally enriched with particular immunological components such as heavy-chain antibodies that represent 75% of total immunoglobulins (IGs) and lactoferrin (LF) at a concentration 3–5 times higher than bovine milk (BM). However, there is a critical processing paradox: the thermal treatments required for the microbiological safety of immunosuppressed children who show a 20-fold greater susceptibility to foodborne pathogens degrade the therapeutic bioactive proteins. This comprehensive review provides a systematic evaluation of processing-induced modifications of CM IGs and LF, which involve thermal and non-thermal technologies, and their effects on the molecular structure and biological function. Emerging alternatives such as high-pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric fields, and strategic fermentation show promising bioactivity retention without compromising safety. Critical knowledge gaps remain in the structure–function relationships of processed CM proteins, necessitating evidence-based optimization strategies to balance microbiological safety with clinically relevant immunomodulatory functions for vulnerable pediatric populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alhaj et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba426d4e9516ffd37a29edhttps://doi.org/10.3390/foods15061028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper