Lumbar oblique radiography plays a crucial role in diagnosing spinal disorders, particularly spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Achieving optimal projection angles remains challenging due to variability in positioning techniques and subjective quality assessment. This study presents a deep learning framework for automatic angle estimation in lumbar oblique X-ray images using a two-stage object detection approach. Training data consisted of synthetic X-ray images generated from CT datasets with known projection angles (20° to 60°), annotated with three classes: L2–L4 vertebral levels, vertebral bodies, and pedicles. Two detection models were compared: Model1, a three-class whole-image detector, and Model2, a single-class pedicle detector applied to vertebral body crops from Model1. The Vertebral–Pedicle Ratio (VPR) was used to estimate projection angle via separate linear regression for negative-angle (n-group) and positive-angle (p-group) projections. Five-fold cross-validation showed Model2 achieved higher detection performance (macro mean AP@0. 5 = 0. 913, mean DSC = 0. 825) than Model1 (macro mean AP@0. 5 = 0. 762, mean DSC = 0. 791). Pooled regression yielded R2ₙ = 0. 832 and R2ₚ = 0. 870. Angle estimation with Model2 achieved MAE = 5. 42° (SD 1. 08°), substantially lower than Model1 (MAE = 9. 57°, SD 1. 64°), while Model1 offered faster throughput (18. 3 FPS vs. 2. 9 FPS). Two-stage pedicle detection using VPR-based linear regression provides clinically acceptable angle estimation accuracy in lumbar oblique radiography. Automated angle verification enables real-time positioning feedback during imaging, post-imaging image quality documentation in PACS, and retrospective auditing of facility positioning protocols. These comprehensive implementations are expected to standardize lumbar oblique radiography.
Yamamoto et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: