PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

From Physiology to Intervention: Endoscopic Adenoid-to-Choanae Ratio Thresholds for Symptomatic Adenoid Hypertrophy in Preschool Children

View Full Paper
AZAleksander ZwierzKMKrystyna MasnaPBPaweł Burduk

Key Points

  • To identify endoscopic adenoid-to-choanae ratio thresholds that differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic preschool children.
  • Retrospective analysis of 225 preschool children (ages 3-7)
  • Flexible nasopharyngoscopy performed to assess adenoid size
  • Standardized history-taking and MASNA scoring used for symptom evaluation
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify optimal A/C thresholds
  • Median A/C ratio was higher in symptomatic children than in asymptomatic children
  • Symptomatic children presented with increased MASNA mucus scores and rhinorrhea frequency
  • ROC analysis identified an A/C ratio of 60% as optimal for distinguishing symptomatic status
  • An A/C ratio >60% was the only independent predictor of symptomatic status

Abstract

ImportanceAdenoid enlargement in preschool children is commonly cited as a cause of nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing, yet age-related lymphoid development complicates differentiation between physiological growth and clinically significant hypertrophy. Existing endoscopic grading schemes lack consensus on age-specific normative limits and clear management thresholds.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine endoscopic adenoid-to-choanae (A/C) ratio cut-offs that discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic preschool children and to propose a practical, management-oriented grading scale.DesignSTROBE.ParticipantsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 225 preschool children (age 3-7). Standardized history-taking, flexible nasopharyngoscopy, MASNA (Mucus on Adenoid Scale by Nasopharyngoscopy Assessment) mucus scoring, and tympanometry were performed.InterventionChildren were classified as symptomatic (≥2 "yes" responses to core symptom items) or asymptomatic (no more than one "occasionally" response). Adenoid size was quantified from blinded video review as the A/C ratio.Main Outcome MeasuresReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal A/C threshold for symptomatic status; multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent predictors.ResultsMedian A/C ratio was greater in symptomatic versus asymptomatic children. Symptomatic children also had higher MASNA mucus scores, greater reported rhinorrhea frequency, and less favorable tympanometric profiles. ROC analysis identified an A/C ratio of 60% as the optimal cut-off to discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic children. An A/C ratio >60% emerged as the sole independent predictor of symptomatic status.ConclusionIn this cohort, the endoscopic A/C ratio strongly discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic presentations. An A/C threshold of 60% reliably separated predominantly asymptomatic from symptomatic children.RelevanceThese findings, in conjunction with clinical experience and results from our previous studies, form the basis for a proposed three-tier, management-oriented endoscopic scale for preschool patients: Degree I (A/C ≤60%)-within age-appropriate norm; Degree II (A/C 65%-75%)-hypertrophy amenable to conservative management/observation; Degree III (A/C ≥80%)-hypertrophy for which we suggest that surgical intervention ought to be considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zwierz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be38ee6e48c4981c679a13https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216261421112
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper