Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis determines A/C ratio thresholds for symptomatic preschool children, suggesting management options.
ImportanceAdenoid enlargement in preschool children is commonly cited as a cause of nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing, yet age-related lymphoid development complicates differentiation between physiological growth and clinically significant hypertrophy. Existing endoscopic grading schemes lack consensus on age-specific normative limits and clear management thresholds.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine endoscopic adenoid-to-choanae (A/C) ratio cut-offs that discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic preschool children and to propose a practical, management-oriented grading scale.DesignSTROBE.ParticipantsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 225 preschool children (age 3-7). Standardized history-taking, flexible nasopharyngoscopy, MASNA (Mucus on Adenoid Scale by Nasopharyngoscopy Assessment) mucus scoring, and tympanometry were performed.InterventionChildren were classified as symptomatic (≥2 "yes" responses to core symptom items) or asymptomatic (no more than one "occasionally" response). Adenoid size was quantified from blinded video review as the A/C ratio.Main Outcome MeasuresReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an optimal A/C threshold for symptomatic status; multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent predictors.ResultsMedian A/C ratio was greater in symptomatic versus asymptomatic children. Symptomatic children also had higher MASNA mucus scores, greater reported rhinorrhea frequency, and less favorable tympanometric profiles. ROC analysis identified an A/C ratio of 60% as the optimal cut-off to discriminate symptomatic from asymptomatic children. An A/C ratio >60% emerged as the sole independent predictor of symptomatic status.ConclusionIn this cohort, the endoscopic A/C ratio strongly discriminated symptomatic from asymptomatic presentations. An A/C threshold of 60% reliably separated predominantly asymptomatic from symptomatic children.RelevanceThese findings, in conjunction with clinical experience and results from our previous studies, form the basis for a proposed three-tier, management-oriented endoscopic scale for preschool patients: Degree I (A/C ≤60%)-within age-appropriate norm; Degree II (A/C 65%-75%)-hypertrophy amenable to conservative management/observation; Degree III (A/C ≥80%)-hypertrophy for which we suggest that surgical intervention ought to be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwierz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: