Retrospective cohort study evaluates a new radiographic index for assessing adenoid obstruction in children, suggesting its practical application.
Objective The clinical assessment of adenoid hypertrophy presents 2 practical challenges: (1) the need for an objective, reproducible estimate of nasopharyngeal obstruction in children when cooperation is limited and (2) the need for a reliable radiographic metric to support interdisciplinary assessment and communication between dental/orthodontic providers and otolaryngologists. To address these challenges, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel radiographic index—Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio—derived from lateral cephalometric radiographs. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University and affiliated orthodontic clinics, Shanghai, China (June 2023‐August 2024). Methods Consecutive children aged 2 to 14 years flagged for suspected adenoid hypertrophy during routine dental examinations were screened; eligible participants were enrolled after prespecified exclusions. De‐identified data were analyzed between August and October 2024. Results ANAR showed a numerically higher correlation with endoscopic grades than the A/N ratio ( r = 0.649 vs 0.603). For severe obstruction, ANAR cutoff 0.64 yielded sensitivity 70.9% and specificity 82.3% (AUC 0.834; 95% CI, 0.76‐0.90); the A/N ratio AUC was 0.793. Inter‐rater reliability for ANAR measurement was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [A,1] = 0.924; 95% confidence interval, 0.848‐0.963; n = 30). Conclusion Adenoid/Nasopharynx Area Ratio is a practical, reproducible planimetric index derived from lateral cephalograms that may support opportunistic upper airway assessment when imaging is already obtained for dental/orthodontic care. Nasal endoscopy remains the reference standard; ANAR is complementary, and additional radiographs solely for adenoid evaluation are not recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: