PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 2026Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment0 citationsOpen Access

The Clinically Meaningful Score Difference and Meaningful Score Regions in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total Score from Post Hoc Analyses of a Phase 3 Pivotal Clinical Trial of Transdermal Asenapine in Patients with Schizophrenia

LCLeslie L CitromePCPál CzoborMKMarina Komaroff

Key Points

  • To determine the clinically meaningful score difference (MSD) and score regions (MSRs) in PANSS total scores for patients treated with asenapine.
  • Conducted a post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial of HP-3070, a transdermal asenapine system.
  • Used CGI-S and CGI-I scores as anchors to measure improvement from baseline to Week 6.
  • Calculated MSD and MSRs for responders based on PANSS scores.
  • 616 patients were analyzed with a mean baseline PANSS total score of 96.6.
  • MSD for change in PANSS score was −30 points.
  • MSRs for change in PANSS score ranged from −37 to −24, with percentage changes from −39% to −25% without adjustment.

Abstract

Purpose: HP-3070, the first asenapine transdermal system (patch), is indicated for adults with schizophrenia. The US Food and Drug Administration recommends analyzing clinical outcome data by using meaningful score difference (MSD) and meaningful score regions (MSRs) to determine what score changes are clinically meaningful to patients. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine the MSD and MSRs in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from the pivotal phase 3 study of HP-3070. Patients and Methods: Clinician-Rated Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scores were used as anchors to quantify improvement from baseline to Week 6 in PANSS total score. The following were identified: MSD—change and percentage change in PANSS for ≥ 50% of responders (CGI-I=1,2) and MSRs—change and percentage change in PANSS by baseline CGI-S for 25th and 75th percentiles of responders. Results: In total, 616 patients were evaluated. The mean (SD) baseline PANSS total score was 96.6 (9.5). MSD of change in PANSS score was − 30 points. MSDs of percentage change in PANSS scores were − 32% and − 46% based on calculations without and with adjustment for the scale’s minimum score, respectively. For all responders defined as CGI-I=1 or 2, MSRs of change in PANSS score ranged from − 37 to − 24. MSRs of percentage change in PANSS score ranged from − 39% to − 25% without adjustment and − 57% to − 37% with adjustment. Conclusion: The MSD and MSRs provide an estimate of expected treatment effect on schizophrenia patients in a population and serve as a threshold to identify individual patients with clinically meaningful improvement. These results contribute to the ongoing discussion of what constitutes a clinically meaningful response in patients with an acute episode of schizophrenia and provide an estimate of the expected treatment effect of HP-3070. Keywords: schizophrenia, PANSS, post hoc analysis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Citrome et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bf8692f665edcd009e8dfahttps://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s562499
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy of HP-3070, A Once-Daily Asenapine Transdermal System, in the Treatment of Adults with Schizophrenia: A PANSS Five-Factor Analysis2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Application of PANSS-6 in the assessment of severity and improvement in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical antipsychotic trial of effectiveness2025
  3. 3Predictive validity of the personal and social performance scale for PANSS outcomes in schizophrenia: a severity-stratified study2026
  4. 4Meaningful within‐person change estimates do not identify responders to treatment2026
  5. 5Applying advanced psychometrics to antipsychotic treatment trials: A protocol comparing effect estimates2026