PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Preparatory Renormalization Estimates for Yang-Mills on S³

View Full Paper
LPLuis Felipe Alonso Pichardo

Key Points

  • The aim is to adapt Balaban's renormalization group methods for Yang-Mills theory on the three-sphere, addressing structural issues present in flat spaces.
  • Adapted Balaban's constructive renormalization group program for S³
  • Constructed proper-time covariance using the coexact spectrum
  • Developed a blocking hierarchy utilizing the 600-cell polytope
  • Performed perturbative analysis yielding exact coefficients
  • Conducted 1077 tests to validate the RG approach
  • Resolved all six structural difficulties from flat space analysis
  • Determined the Gribov diameter relation for S³
  • Achieved a one-loop coefficient of 22/3 for SU(2)
  • Validated the renormalization infrastructure with a 100% pass rate

Abstract

We adapt Balaban's constructive renormalization group program (1984–89) for pure Yang-Mills theory from flat tori to the three-sphere S³R, and prove that on this compact background all six structural difficulties of the flat-space analysis are resolved — including the large-field problem that consumes approximately 100 pages of Balaban's Papers 11–12. The proper-time covariance decomposition is constructed using the exactly known coexact spectrum λₖ = (k+1) ²/R², the 600-cell polytope provides a natural blocking hierarchy with icosahedral symmetry, and the first perturbative RG step yields the correct one-loop coefficient b₀ = 22/3 for SU (2) from exact spectral sums. The key new result is that the Gribov diameter on S³ in the 9-DOF truncation satisfies d·R = 9√3/ (2g), which implies that the large-field region is empty within the Gribov region at physical coupling. Consequently, Balaban's large-field analysis reduces to a one-line bound on S³, and the one-step RG contraction is proven. 1077 tests verify the RG infrastructure at 100% pass rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luis Felipe Alonso Pichardo (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c0e007fddb9876e79c1842https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19153477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Constructive Renormalization and Continuum Limit for Yang-Mills on S³2026
  2. 2Mass Gap for Yang-Mills Theory on S³ × ℝ: Proof, Predictions, and Compact Topology2026
  3. 3Wilson–Haar Renormalization and a Positive Mass Gap for Four-Dimensional SU(3) Yang–Mills Theory2026
  4. 4Global Regularity of Yang–Mills via S4 Spherical Compactification2026
  5. 5Mass Gap for Yang-Mills Theory on Compact Spatial Manifolds: Geometric Origin, Constructive QFT, and Physical Evidence2026