PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026ACS ES&T Water2 citations

Integrating Process-Based and Machine Learning Models for High Temporal-Resolution Algal Bloom Prediction in Rivers with Sparse Monitoring Data

View Full Paper
SXShujie XuHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityYTYe TianNingbo UniversitySHShu-Chien HsuHong Kong Polytechnic University

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance algal bloom predictions using a hybrid model that combines process-based and machine learning approaches.
  • Developed a hybrid framework integrating machine learning with process-based models.
  • Utilized Random Forest algorithm to identify key drivers of algal blooms from sparse data.
  • Reconstructed daily time-series data for algal bloom drivers using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT).
  • Trained an ML model on SWAT-reconstructed data to predict chlorophyll-a levels.
  • Achieved a test R2 of 0.58 for chlorophyll-a predictions.
  • Kling-Gupta Efficiency was measured at 0.56.
  • Root-mean-square error for predictions was 0.109 μg/L.
  • Demonstrated that reliable predictions can be made using minimal monitoring variables.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of algal blooms is often hindered by the scarcity of high-frequency water quality data, as field monitoring typically provides only discontinuous and sparse measurements. While machine learning (ML) models require large training data sets and process-based models demand extensive parametrization, we develop a hybrid framework that leverages the complementary strengths of both to provide a practical decision support framework. Using a Random Forest algorithm to identify key algal bloom drivers from sparse monthly observations in the Lam Tsuen River, Hong Kong, we then reconstruct physically consistent, daily time-series for these drivers by Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). An ML model trained solely on these SWAT-reconstructed inputs achieves reliable chlorophyll-a predictions (test R2 = 0.58, Kling-Gupta Efficiency = 0.56, and root-mean-square error = 0.109 μg/L), demonstrating that accurate daily predictions can be obtained with a minimal set of variables. This study presents a parsimonious, transferable workflow that transforms limited monitoring data into an operational prediction tool, enabling cost-effective algal bloom management in data-limited watersheds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc37fdc3bde448917809https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.6c00132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper