PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Behavioral Sciences2 citationsOpen Access

Generative Artificial Intelligence Self-Efficacy and Learning Engagement Among Special Education Teacher Trainees: A Moderated Mediation Model

View Full Paper
XLXiage LiuJYJin YangWZWei Zhao

Key Points

  • This research investigates how generative AI self-efficacy influences learning engagement among special education teacher trainees.
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Questionnaire survey administered to 434 special education teacher trainees
  • Analysis of associations between self-efficacy, learning engagement, problem-solving ability, and critical thinking.
  • GenAI self-efficacy positively correlates with learning engagement.
  • Problem-solving ability mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and learning engagement.
  • Critical thinking significantly moderates the effect of self-efficacy on problem-solving ability.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), known for its personalization and intelligence, is gaining traction in special education as a tool to address diverse learner needs. As future key practitioners integrating intelligent technology to promote educational equity, how special education teacher trainees effectively utilize GenAI has become a critical issue. In the context of Chinese higher education, this study employed a cross-sectional design and administered a questionnaire survey to 434 special education teacher trainees. The aim was to examine the association between their GenAI self-efficacy and learning engagement, with particular attention to the potential mediating association of problem-solving ability and the moderating role of critical thinking. The results revealed the following: GenAI self-efficacy was positively associated with learning engagement, and problem-solving ability played a mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy and learning engagement. Moreover, critical thinking significantly moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and problem-solving ability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c772158bbfbc51511e25d2https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040488
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rethinking teacher education in an AI world: perceptions, readiness and institutional support for generative AI integration2025 · 12 citations
  2. 2The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem‐solving2025 · 47 citations
  3. 3Using AI to Support Special Education Teacher Workload2024 · 58 citations
  4. 4Do students need to think hard? The interplay of AI and cognitive abilities in solving problems2025 · 16 citations
  5. 5Empowering Masters of Creative Problem Solvers: The Impact of STEM Professional Development Training on Teachers’ Attitudes, Self-Efficacy, and Problem-Solving Skills2025 · 4 citations