First CMI trial in adolescents; late-breaking at ACC.26, simultaneous NEJM publication, >700 social shares, major news coverage in pediatric and adult cardiology circles, high expert commentary score.
Mavacamten resulted in a significantly greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction than placebo in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Does mavacamten reduce left ventricular outflow tract obstruction compared to placebo in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Adolescent patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Mavacamten
Placebo
Reduction in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction over a 28-week periodsurrogate
Mavacamten significantly reduces left ventricular outflow tract obstruction compared to placebo in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Approved pharmacologic therapies for pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are lacking, and surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The efficacy and safety of mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor that is available for adults, warrant evaluation in adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving symptomatic adolescents (12 to <18 years of age) with New York Heart Association class II or III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mavacamten or placebo. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 28 in left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient provoked by the Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients underwent randomization; 23 patients (8 35% of whom were female) were assigned to mavacamten group, and 21 (5 24% of whom were female) were assigned to the placebo group. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 14.7±1.7 years in the mavacamten group and 14.6±1.7 years in the placebo group, and the mean Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient at baseline was similar in the two groups (78.4±34.1 mm Hg and 80.8±47.4 mm Hg, respectively). At week 28, the least-squares mean change in the Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient was -48.5 mm Hg in the mavacamten group and -0.5 mm Hg in the placebo group (difference, -48.0 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -67.7 to -28.3; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. Two patients in each group had serious adverse events; in the mavacamten group, 1 patient had two episodes of syncope, and another had an inappropriate shock delivered by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; in the placebo group, 1 patient had chest pain, and another had depression with suicidal ideation. No patient had a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50%. No deaths occurred during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Among adolescent patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the reduction in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was significantly greater with mavacamten than with placebo over a 28-week period. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; SCOUT-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06253221.).
“These results, which are from one of the few prospective randomized trials of medical therapy for cardiovascular disease in childhood, support the use of mavacamten as an efficacious treatment option for symptomatic obstructive HCM in adolescent patients.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joseph W. Rossano
Charles Canter
Cordula M. Wolf
New England Journal of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania
University of California, Los Angeles
Washington University in St. Louis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rossano et al. (Sun,) reported a other. Mavacamten resulted in a significantly greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction than placebo in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb59f16edfba7beb8767e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2601103
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: