Background/Objectives: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) represent a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders caused by mutations in over 280 genes with more than 3100 identified variants. While gene-specific replacement therapies have achieved landmark success with voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna) for biallelic RPE65-associated retinal dystrophy, developing individual therapies for each genetic subtype remains impractical. This review examines gene-agnostic therapeutic approaches utilizing neuroprotection and immunomodulation that target common pathophysiological mechanisms shared across multiple IRD genotypes. Methods: We reviewed the literature on neuroprotective and immunomodulatory gene therapy strategies for IRDs, focusing on neurotrophic factors and complement system modulation. Results: Neuroprotective approaches delivering neurotrophic factors—including pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), rod-derived cone viability factor (RdCVF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and proinsulin—have demonstrated photoreceptor preservation across multiple preclinical IRD models regardless of the underlying genetic mutation. The recent FDA approval of CNTF cell-based gene therapy (Encelto) for macular telangiectasia type 2 validates this therapeutic paradigm. Complement system inhibition represents another gene-agnostic strategy, with intravitreal complement inhibitors approved for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration and gene therapy approaches targeting C3, C5, or delivering soluble complement regulators under investigation for IRDs. Combination strategies simultaneously addressing multiple pathogenic pathways may offer synergistic benefits. Conclusions: Gene-agnostic approaches targeting neuroprotection and immunomodulation offer a therapeutic paradigm capable of benefiting patients across the spectrum of IRD genotypes, potentially transforming treatment for conditions where mutation-specific therapies remain unavailable.
Rowe et al. (2026) studied this question.