This study explores how the globalisation of Indigenous human rights is reshaping nature conservation within the UNESCO World Heritage regime and challenging the enduring legacies of “green colonialism.” Building on environmental-historical accounts of fortress conservation and on Indigenous critiques of exclusionary protected-area politics, the study expands Thomas Schmitt’s cultural-geographic approach to UNESCO World Heritage by including the perspective of a global nature conservation regime in which competing conservation paradigms are negotiated. It asks (1) how the global institutionalisation of Indigenous rights norms, especially the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, contests exclusionary conservation practices in World Heritage, and (2) how paradigm competition transforms power relations between Indigenous peoples and the institutional complex of States Parties, Advisory Bodies, and the World Heritage Centre. The analysis combines world society theory, figurational sociology, and decolonial approaches to trace shifting dependencies, normative isomorphism, and the coloniality of knowledge in World Heritage decision-making. Empirically, the dissertation employs a historical and regional comparative approach across four sites: Manú National Park (Peru), Tongariro National Park (Aotearoa/New Zealand), Lake Bogoria (Kenya), and Pimachiowin Aki (Canada). A qualitative content analysis of official UNESCO records from 1987 to 2023 (including World Heritage Committee decisions, Advisory Body evaluations, State of Conservation reports, nomination files, and management plans) is conducted. Findings show an uneven institutionalisation of Indigenous rights across cases and over time. While formal references to participation and Indigenous human rights have expanded, implementation often remains partial, reflecting a persistent decoupling between normative commitments and conservation practice. Nevertheless, the regime displays limited but notable openness to human rights-based and inclusive conservation, particularly when Indigenous actors and human rights institutions intervene. Overall, the study argues that the World Heritage regime has become a contested platform for addressing historical injustices and that its legitimacy increasingly depends on Indigenous-led approaches to the designation and management of World Heritage properties. Methodologically, it demonstrates how UNESCO’s repository of official records can be used to reconstruct organisational “documentary realities” and trace institutional change comparatively.
Robert Rode (Thu,) studied this question.