PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Guide to Education Innovation0 citationsOpen Access

Analysis of Competency Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Psychological Counseling Practitioners in Colleges and Universities

View Full Paper
LCLi ChengzhiQZQin ZhuolinHSHuang Shaoxu

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the competency characteristics and factors influencing university psychological counseling practitioners.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional survey of 256 practitioners in Guangxi universities.
  • Utilized various scales including general situation scale and competency characteristic scale.
  • Analyzed data to identify differences in competencies based on demographics and other variables.
  • Practitioners had a moderate total competency score of 22.87±3.11.
  • Significant differences in competencies based on age, title levels, and burnout levels were found (p < 0.05).
  • Age and health status were identified as significant predictors of competency (β = 2.416, -2.834, p < 0.05).
  • General self-efficacy positively predicted competency characteristics (β = 6.312, p < 0.001).
  • Higher burnout levels negatively impacted practitioners’ competencies (β = -4.459, p < 0.001).

Abstract

Objective: To understand the competency characteristics and influencing factors of university psychological counseling practitioners, and to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for improving the competence of practitioners. Methods: A cross-sectional survey method was used to investigate and analyze 256 psychological counseling practitioners in Guangxi universities using the general situation scale, competency characteristic scale, general self-efficacy scale and burnout scale. Results: The total score of competency characteristics among university psychological counseling practitioners was 22.87±3.11, indicating a moderate level of competency. There were significant differences in competency characteristics among different ages, title levels, hobbies, qualifications, years of practice and average case counseling treatment groups (p < 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that age and health status were significant predictors of practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = 2.416, -2.834, p < 0.05). General self-efficacy significantly and positively predicted practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = 6.312, p < 0.001). Burnout had a significant negative predictive effect on practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = -4.459, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The competence of university counseling practitioners is medium, and demographic variables affect competence to a certain extent. Enhancing self-efficacy and reducing burnout levels can effectively improve practitioners’ competency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chengzhi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fc28a79560c99a0a1d79https://doi.org/10.35534/gei.0601002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper