Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes competency characteristics in university counselors, indicating self-efficacy and burnout influence effectiveness.
Objective: To understand the competency characteristics and influencing factors of university psychological counseling practitioners, and to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for improving the competence of practitioners. Methods: A cross-sectional survey method was used to investigate and analyze 256 psychological counseling practitioners in Guangxi universities using the general situation scale, competency characteristic scale, general self-efficacy scale and burnout scale. Results: The total score of competency characteristics among university psychological counseling practitioners was 22.87±3.11, indicating a moderate level of competency. There were significant differences in competency characteristics among different ages, title levels, hobbies, qualifications, years of practice and average case counseling treatment groups (p < 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that age and health status were significant predictors of practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = 2.416, -2.834, p < 0.05). General self-efficacy significantly and positively predicted practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = 6.312, p < 0.001). Burnout had a significant negative predictive effect on practitioners’ competency characteristics (β = -4.459, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The competence of university counseling practitioners is medium, and demographic variables affect competence to a certain extent. Enhancing self-efficacy and reducing burnout levels can effectively improve practitioners’ competency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chengzhi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: