Large-scale urban tree donation campaigns are widely implemented worldwide as nature-based solutions for climate adaptation and mitigation; however, most programs lack individual-level traceability and post-donation monitoring, limiting accountability and evidence-based management. A fundamental prerequisite for longitudinal survival assessment is the existence of a reliable traceability infrastructure capable of linking individual trees to verified planting records over time. This study proposes and empirically evaluates a participatory digital traceability system that establishes this foundational infrastructure, conceptualized as a distributed data validation architecture for donation-based urban afforestation programs. The framework integrates (i) persistent digital identifiers, (ii) geospatial registration, (iii) distributed multi-stage validation, and (iv) structured citizen reporting, and is operationalized through an installation-free progressive web application (ArborizaCL). The approach was deployed in five real-world campaigns conducted in Valdivia, Chile (May–September 2025), registering 642 trees distributed to 240 participants. A total of 190 georeferenced planting reports were submitted, corresponding to an overall reporting rate of 29.6%. Reporting behavior varied substantially by institutional follow-up strategy: campaigns with active follow-up achieved a mean reporting rate of 54.0%, compared with 13.0% under passive strategies, yielding a 41.0 percentage point difference (315.8% relative increase). Spatial analysis of reported plantings showed a predominance of urban (51.1%) and peri-urban (42.1%) locations, enabling differentiated territorial assessment. These results indicate that while digital infrastructure enables traceability and transparent monitoring, sustained citizen engagement is strongly associated with institutional coordination mechanisms. Beyond environmental monitoring, the proposed framework contributes to information governance by demonstrating how participatory digital traceability systems can support distributed public-sector oversight and outcome-oriented evaluation. The framework provides a transferable methodological basis for strengthening monitoring capacity, transparency, and governance design in publicly funded afforestation initiatives and other distributed civic programs.
Veas-Castillo et al. (Sun,) studied this question.