PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1978Circulation284 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac tamponade: hemodynamic observations in man.

View Full Paper
PRP S ReddyECE I CurtissJOJ D O'Toole

Key Points

  • To evaluate hemodynamic changes in patients with cardiac tamponade following pericardiocentesis.
  • Conducted hemodynamic studies in 19 patients with pericardial effusion before and after pericardiocentesis.

Structured PICO

Does pericardiocentesis improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, and what determines the presence of pulsus paradoxus?

P
Population
19 patients with pericardial effusion, including 14 with cardiac tamponade (10 with pulsus paradoxus, 4 without pulsus paradoxus who had chronic renal failure) and 5 without cardiac tamponade.
I
Intervention
Pericardiocentesis (with gradual fluid withdrawal)
C
Comparator
Pre-pericardiocentesis baseline (before-and-after comparison) and patients without cardiac tamponade
O
Outcome
Changes in hemodynamic parameters (right atrial pressure, cardiac output, inspiratory systemic arterial pulse pressure, right ventricular end-diastolic pressure, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure)surrogate

Pericardiocentesis significantly improves hemodynamics in cardiac tamponade, but classic signs like pulsus paradoxus may be absent in patients with pre-existing elevated pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, such as those with chronic renal failure.

Abstract

Hemodynamic studies were performed before and after pericardiocentesis in 19 patients with pericardial effusion. Right atrial pressure decreases significantly, from 16 +/- 4 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) to 7 +/- 5 mm Hg in 14 patients with cardiac tamponade. This change was accompanied by significant increases in cardiac output (3.87 +/- 1.77 to 7 +/- 2.2 l/min) and inspiratory systemic arterial pulse pressure (45 +/- 29 to 81 +/- 23 mm Hg). The remaining five patients did not demonstrate cardiac tamponade, as evidenced by lack of significant change in these hemodynamic parameters. In all patients with tamponade, right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP) was elevated and equal to pericardial pressure; equilibration was uniformly absent in patients without tamponade. During gradual fluid withdrawal in the tamponade group, significant hemodynamic improvement was largely confined to the period when right ventricular filling pressure remained equilibrated with pericardial pressure. In 10 patients with tamponade and pulsus paradoxus, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAW) was equal to pericardial pressure except during early inspiration and expiration when it was transiently less and greater, respectively; however, inspiratory right atrial pressure never fell below pericardial pressure. In these 10 patients, PAW decreased significantly following pericardiocentesis (P less than 0.001). In the remaining four patients with tamponade but without pulsus paradoxus, all of whom had chronic renal failure, PAW was consistently higher than pericardial pressure or RVEDP and did not decrease after pericardiocentesis. These data tend to confirm the hypothesis that in patients with tamponade, the venous pressure required to maintain any given cardiac volume is determined by pericardial rather than ventricular compliance. When pericardial compliance determines diastolic pressure in both ventricles, relative filling of the ventricles will be competitive and determined by their respective venous pressures (pulmonary vs systemic), which vary with respiration and alternately favor right and left ventricular filling. This results in pulsus paradoxus. However, if pulmonary arterial wedge pressure is markedly elevated before the onset of tamponade, as in patients with chronic renal failure, then pericardial compliance may only determine right ventricular filling pressure. In such cases, pulsus paradoxus may be absent.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reddy et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56b4175589c71d767c9bbhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.58.2.265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Circulatory Effects of Isoproterenol, Acetylstrophanthidin, and Volume Loading in Acute Pericardial Tamponade1969 · 26 citations
  2. 2Effect of respiration on venous return and stroke volume in cardiac tamponade1970 · 24 citations
  3. 3Pressure-Flow Studies in Man: Effect of Respiration on Left Ventricular Stroke Volume1973 · 138 citations
  4. 4Transmural Ventricular Pressures in Experimental Cardiac Tamponade1959 · 40 citations
  5. 5Inspiratory Traction on the Pericardium1961 · 52 citations