PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance981 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review

PHPhilip HaafPGPankaj GargDMDaniel Messroghli

Structured PICO

Does cardiac T1 mapping and ECV assessment improve the detection of diffuse myocardial fibrosis compared to LGE in patients with cardiomyopathies?

P
Population
Patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies and acute chest pain syndromes
I
Intervention
Cardiac T1 mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) assessment
C
Comparator
Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE)
O
Outcome
Detection and quantification of focal and diffuse alterations in myocardial structuresurrogate

Cardiac T1 mapping and ECV assessment provide valuable non-invasive tissue characterization for detecting diffuse myocardial fibrosis that may be missed by standard LGE imaging.

Abstract

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is increasingly used to differentiate the aetiology of cardiomyopathies. Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) is the reference standard for non-invasive imaging of myocardial scar and focal fibrosis and is valuable in the differential diagnosis of ischaemic versus non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Diffuse fibrosis may go undetected on LGE imaging. Tissue characterisation with parametric mapping methods has the potential to detect and quantify both focal and diffuse alterations in myocardial structure not assessable by LGE. Native and post-contrast T1 mapping in particular has shown promise as a novel biomarker to support diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic decision making in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies as well as in patients with acute chest pain syndromes. Furthermore, changes in the myocardium over time may be assessed longitudinally with this non-invasive tissue characterisation method.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haaf et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d576f062196bac97d9bd34https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0308-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1T1 and T2 Mapping in Cardiology: “Mapping the Obscure Object of Desire”2017 · 71 citations
  2. 2Novel cardiac magnetic resonance biomarkers: native T1 and extracellular volume myocardial mapping2016 · 21 citations
  3. 3Cardiac magnetic resonance T1 mapping. Part 2: Diagnostic potential and applications2018 · 48 citations
  4. 4T1 and ECV Mapping in Myocardial Disease2017 · 1 citations
  5. 5T1-Mapping in Daily Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Practice: Combined Use of Native T1 and Extracellular Volume Quantification2016 · 3 citations