PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2023International Journal of Medical Informatics69 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of machine learning and conventional logistic regression-based prediction models for gestational diabetes in an ethnically diverse population; the Monash GDM Machine learning model

View Full Paper
YBYitayeh BelstiMonash UniversityLMLisa MoranUniversity College DublinLDLan DuAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this study, machine learning approaches achieved the best predictive performance over traditional statistical methods, increasing from 75 to 93%. The CatBoost classifier method achieved the best with the model including continuous variables.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Belsti et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d73ce3c74376700bf30f37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model2020 · 2,798 citations
  2. 2Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes2017 · 1,693 citations
  3. 3Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea2005 · 2,307 citations
  4. 4Scaling of human body composition to stature: new insights into body mass index2007 · 210 citations
  5. 5Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–20122016 · 348 citations