PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology0 citations

Replacing Cobalt With a CoCrFeNiAl 0.3 High‐Entropy Alloy Binder in WC Cermets: Toward Enhanced Wear Resistance

View Full Paper
SMSedigheh MontazerIsfahan University of TechnologyMHMorteza HadiIsfahan University of TechnologyHPHadi PirjamaliIsfahan University of Technology

Key Points

  • Investigate the potential of a CoCrFeNiAl high-entropy alloy as a binder in WC cermets to enhance wear resistance and performance.
  • Fabricated WC–Co and WC–HEA cermets using spark plasma sintering.
  • Evaluated relative densities and microstructural properties.
  • Conducted hardness, wear resistance, and friction tests.
  • WC–HEA exhibited higher hardness (1751 HV) compared to WC–Co (1346 HV).
  • Significant wear resistance improvement with mass loss of 0.0041 g for WC–HEA vs. 0.0147 g for WC–Co.
  • WC–HEA showed a lower coefficient of friction (0.4998 average) compared to 0.5446 for WC–Co.
  • Moderate decrease in fracture toughness (10.34 MPa·m½ for WC–HEA vs. 11.53 MPa·m½ for WC–Co).

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the replacement of cobalt with a CoCrFeNiAl 0 . 3 high‐entropy alloy (HEA) binder in WC cermets fabricated via spark plasma sintering (SPS). Both WC–Co and WC–HEA cermets achieved near‐full densification, with relative densities of 99.78% and 99.84%, respectively. The WC–HEA composite exhibited a significant increase in hardness (1751 HV vs. 1346 HV, ∼30% higher) and demonstrated superior wear resistance after a 1000 m sliding test, with a mass loss of only 0.0041 g compared to 0.0147 g for WC–Co (over 70% reduction). Additionally, the WC–HEA cermet showed a lower and more stable coefficient of friction (average 0.4998 vs. 0.5446, ∼8% lower) and generated less oxide‐rich debris, indicating enhanced oxidation resistance during sliding. However, a moderate decrease in fracture toughness was observed (10.34 MPa·m½ for WC–HEA vs. 11.53 MPa·m½ for WC–Co). Microstructural analyses revealed that the HEA binder formed a multiphase structure containing W‐rich solid solution and Cr–Fe carbides, contributing to hardness and wear improvements. These findings demonstrate that HEA binders provide a promising alternative to conventional monolithic cobalt binders, offering superior tribological and mechanical performance, albeit with a trade‐off in toughness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montazer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ec6c1944d70ce05db8https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.70174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper