Airport stand allocation research has traditionally focused on optimizing assignments within fixed infrastructure configurations, while strategic decisions regarding stand category composition remain underexplored. This study investigates how different proportional distributions of stand categories affect system-level performance under high traffic demand at international airports. A discrete-event simulation model implemented in MATLAB evaluates fifteen infrastructure configurations with varying distributions of small, medium, and large stands, classified according to the ICAO Annex 14. The model employed a first-come–first-served allocation logic to isolate infrastructure-driven effects from algorithmic decision-making. System throughput was measured through acceptance and rejection rates, disaggregated by aircraft stand category. Acceptance rates ranged from 33% to 92% across tested configurations, demonstrating pronounced sensitivity to stand composition. Balanced configurations consistently outperformed asymmetric alternatives. Insufficient stand availability in any single category led to concentrated rejection patterns and non-linear performance degradation; excess capacity in unconstrained categories could not compensate for shortfalls in constrained ones. Proportionality across stand categories is identified as a critical determinant of infrastructure robustness. The proposed simulation framework provides a computationally efficient tool for early-stage (pre-operational planning phase) infrastructure screening, supporting informed strategic capacity decisions prior to detailed operational optimization.
Jenčová et al. (Wed,) studied this question.