PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Abdominal Radiology0 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic evaluation of renal masses in chronic kidney disease: a clinical and radiologic challenge

LELaura EusebiFMFederica MasinoMMManuela Montatore

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing renal masses in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
  • Reviewed literature on renal mass diagnosis in CKD
  • Evaluated the performance of CEUS compared to conventional imaging techniques
  • Proposed a structured workflow integrating CKD stage, dialysis status, and acquired cystic kidney disease
  • CEUS enhances visibility of renal masses by showing real-time perfusion characteristics
  • It helps differentiate between vascular tumor components and non-vascular materials
  • The CEUS-adapted Bosniak approach reduces misclassification of kidney lesions

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly with long-term dialysis exposure and acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD). At the same time, CKD-related architectural distortion and hypoperfusion reduce lesion conspicuity on ultrasound and weaken enhancement-based interpretation on CT and MRI. In advanced CKD, restrictions on iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents further increase the proportion of renal masses that remain indeterminate after conventional imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) addresses the key unmet need in this setting: a safe, direct assessment of microvascular perfusion. Microbubble agents are purely intravascular and non-nephrotoxic, enabling use across all CKD stages and in dialysis patients. By showing real-time enhancement of septa, wall thickening and mural nodules, CEUS distinguishes vascular tumour components from avascular hemorrhagic or proteinaceous material that can mimic enhancement on CT/DECT or signal abnormalities on non-contrast MRI. This capability supports a CEUS-adapted Bosniak approach: lesion categorization is driven by enhancement of septa, wall and nodules rather than by attenuation or T1 hyperintensity of cyst contents, helping avoid misclassification in ACKD. We propose a structured workflow that integrates the triad of CKD stage/eGFR, dialysis status and ACKD with pre- and post-CEUS Bosniak assessment to guide follow-up versus biopsy or nephron-sparing treatment. This article is a narrative review of the literature, complemented by an illustrative clinical case which demonstrates how CEUS can resolve ambiguity when CT/DECT and non-contrast MRI remain inconclusive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eusebi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37774fe01fead37c56c6https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05491-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper