PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1999International Journal of Epidemiology604 citationsOpen Access

Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology

View Full Paper
MBM Blettner

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different review methods for assessing risk factors in epidemiology.
  • Focus on data pooling to assess high-prevalence risk factors.
  • Examine deficiencies in review methods used in epidemiological studies.
  • Discuss issues related to combining studies with varying designs and analytic approaches.
  • Identified common errors and biases associated with pooling diverse studies.
  • Highlighted the need for standardized methodologies in epidemiological reviews.

Abstract

For a full assessment of risk factors with a high prevalence in the general population, pooling of data will become increasingly important. Future research needs to focus on the deficiencies of review methods, in particular, the errors and biases that can be produced when studies are combined that have used different designs, methods and analytic models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

M Blettner (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de64c2210a0977fce93f89https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/28.1.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper