PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 2017Journal of Educational Psychology192 citationsOpen Access

Improving performance and retention in introductory biology with a utility-value intervention.

View Full Paper
ECElizabeth A. CanningJHJudith M. HarackiewiczSPStacy J. Priniski

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

One way to encourage performance and persistence in STEM fields is to have students write about the utility value (UV) or personal relevance of course topics to their life. This intervention has been shown to increase engagement and performance in introductory courses. However, questions remain about the longevity of the effects and how best to implement the intervention in terms of dosage and timing. We tested a UV intervention in the first semester of a two-semester introductory biology sequence. For each of three units across the semester, students (N = 577) were randomly assigned to receive either a UV writing assignment, in which they explained why course material was useful to them personally, or a control assignment, in which they summarized course material. This fully crossed design tested the effect of UV dosage level (0, 1, 2, or 3 UV assignments) as well as the effect of timing (e.g., UV first, control first). We found that students exposed to any dosage of UV earned higher grades in the course, were more likely to enroll in the second course of the biology sequence, and were less likely to abandon their STEM major than students who did not receive any UV assignments. In terms of timing, students with a history of poor performance benefitted from writing a UV essay in the beginning of the semester, whereas higher-performing students benefitted from a UV essay at the end of the semester. Recommendations for practice are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Canning et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de9b537702a00918b0bfd3https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000244
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility–value information.2015 · 194 citations
  2. 2Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions1994 · 314 citations
  3. 3Who Am I and What Am I Going to Do With My Life? Personal and Collective Identities as Motivators of Action2009 · 1,411 citations
  4. 4Interest, Learning, and Motivation1991 · 903 citations
  5. 5To Be or Not to Be: Major Choices in Budding Scientists2010 · 28 citations