PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2011Hypertension198 citationsOpen Access

Chlorthalidone Reduces Cardiovascular Events Compared With Hydrochlorothiazide

View Full Paper
MDMichael P. DorschBGBrenda W. GillespieSESteven R. Erickson

Structured PICO

Does chlorthalidone reduce cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide in men aged 35 to 57 years for primary cardiovascular prevention?

P
Population
Men 35 to 57 years of age enrolled in a cardiovascular primary prevention trial (Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial data set)
I
Intervention
Chlorthalidone
C
Comparator
Hydrochlorothiazide or neither drug
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular eventshard clinical

In a retrospective cohort of men aged 35-57, chlorthalidone significantly reduced cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide, supporting its use as the preferred thiazide-type diuretic for hypertension.

Abstract

There is significant controversy around whether chlorthalidone (CTD) is superior to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in hypertension management. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effects of CTD compared with HCTZ on cardiovascular event (CVE) rates. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial data set from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial was a cardiovascular primary prevention trial where participants were men 35 to 57 years of age enrolled and followed beginning in 1973. CVEs were measured yearly, and time to event was assessed by Cox regression. Systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, potassium, glucose, and uric acid were measured yearly. The difference between groups was evaluated by repeated-measures mixed modeling, and each model was adjusted for predictors of each variable. CVEs were significantly lower in those on CTD (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.51 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.61; P<0.0001) and on HCTZ (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.65 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.75; P<0.0001) compared with those who took neither drug. When comparing the 2 drugs, CTD had significantly fewer CVEs compared with HCTZ (P=0.0016). CTD displayed significantly lower SBP (P<0.0001), lower total cholesterol (P<0.0001), lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.0009), lower potassium (P=0.0003), and higher uric acid (P<0.0001) over time compared with HCTZ. In conclusion, both HCTZ and CTD reduce CVEs compared with neither drug. When comparing both drugs, CTD reduces CVEs more than HCTZ, suggesting that CTD may be the preferred thiazide-type diuretic for hypertension in patients at high risk of CVEs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dorsch et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df44726324afb55d591ed0https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.161505
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Meta-Analysis of Dose-Response Characteristics of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone: Effects on Systolic Blood Pressure and Potassium2010 · 119 citations
  2. 2The Choice of Thiazide Diuretics2009 · 40 citations
  3. 3Chlorthalidone – a renaissance in use?2009 · 22 citations
  4. 4All Thiazide‐Like Diuretics Are Not Chlorthalidone: Putting the ACCOMPLISH Study Into Perspective2009 · 43 citations
  5. 5Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)2002 · 5,705 citations