Rapid and accurate chlorophyll monitoring is critical for precision cotton management, yet existing hyperspectral inversion methods often lack interpretability due to insufficient integration of physiological mechanisms. This study established a dual-pathway framework combining data-driven narrowband spectral index screening and mechanism-guided sensitive band extraction to estimate cotton canopy Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) values using hyperspectral data (350–1075 nm). Field experiments across 20 plots with four water-nitrogen treatments collected 120 leaf samples during the flowering-boll stage. Three spectral preprocessing methods (original, first-derivative, continuum-removed) were systematically compared with three index types, namely Difference Spectral Index (DSI), Ratio Spectral Index (RSI), and Normalized Difference Spectral Index (NDSI), to identify optimal features. Correlation analysis revealed SPAD-sensitive regions in the green band and red-edge to near-infrared region, with first-derivative RSI (742, 952) achieving the highest correlation (r = 0.78). Mechanism-driven screening independently identified 742 nm as the core band (r = 0.76, p < 0.001), validating consistency between spectral features and chlorophyll absorption-scattering transitions. Among three machine learning algorithms, namely Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest (RF), were evaluated. Random Forest demonstrated superior performance: the FDS-RSI-RF model achieved R² = 0.79 and RMSE = 2.0 SPAD units (3.4% relative error), while the mechanism-based 742 nm-RF model yielded R² = 0.86 and RMSE = 1.8 SPAD units. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed that 742 nm contributed the highest feature importance, with values ranging from -4 to +4. This study validates the synergy between physiological mechanisms and data-driven approaches, providing a robust interpretable framework for non-destructive crop monitoring in precision agriculture.
Wang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: