PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Iconic Research and Engineering Journals0 citations

Fractured Gazes: Dual Perspectives and the Construction of Truth in International Relations

View Full Paper
ATAnshin M Thomas

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how visual media in international relations constructs varying truths through dual perspectives.
  • Analyzed five case studies of films related to conflicts and security.
  • Applied visual semiotics to interpret images and soundtracks.
  • Utilized discourse analysis to uncover underlying narratives and ideologies.
  • Highlighted how dual gazes influence perceptions of violence and security.
  • Demonstrated that aesthetic representations can manipulate emotions.
  • Contested traditional views in international relations, advocating for post-structuralist approaches.

Abstract

This dissertation, “Fractured Gazes: Dual Perspectives and the Construction of Truth in International Relations”, investigates the visual turn in IR, where aesthetic images, movies, soundtracks, and drone footage are actively constructing perspectival truths instead of reflecting objective reality. Based on Foucault's paradigm of power and knowledge and Mulvey's theory of the gaze, this research investigates the fractured gazes of elite voyeurism, which constructs security and heroism discourses, and subaltern gazes that expose ethical fractures and partialities. Using visual semiotics and discourse analysis, this research deconstructs five cases: the Bollywood films ‘Haider’ (2014) and ‘Madras Café’ (2013) on South Asian insurgencies, the Hollywood drone films ‘Eye in the Sky’ (2015) and ‘Good Kill’ (2014), and ‘Tora! Tora! Tora!’ (1970) on Pearl Harbor, to demonstrate how dual gazes aestheticize violence, manipulate emotions through soundtracks, and fracture truth into multiplicities that correspond to Butler's grievable lives and Baudrillard's hyperreality. The results contest positivist IR, encouraging a post-structuralist integration of the visual as a discursive space that maintains hegemony but also enables the possibility of resistance, with implications for policy reflexivity (e.g., drone ethics) and media ethics (balanced journalism). Through the proof of truth as

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anshin M Thomas (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47282010ef96374d8e8abhttps://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i10-1716351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Unveiling the Gaze: Power, Identity, and Perception in the Interdisciplinary Lens2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2The Traumatic Mirror and the Asymptote: Cinematic Representations of American Intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Representation of Reality and Truth2025
  4. 4Ugly Truths and the Aesthetics of Disruption2026
  5. 5The War of the Mirrors Images2023