Conceptual ambiguity in People–Place Relationships (PPR) research limits consistent operationalization and cross-context comparability, particularly in under-represented cultural settings. This study develops an integrated, context-sensitive framework for assessing PPR in residential environments and empirically examines its measurement structure. The framework is applied in Damascus as a pilot context to assess its structural validity, internal consistency, and applicability. The methodological approach comprised two stages: conceptual development and empirical validation. First, two rounds of case-study analysis derived from a prior systematic literature review synthesized environmental (social and urban) and relational (cognitive, affective, attachment) dimensions into a coherent framework. Second, the framework was operationalized and tested using survey data from 1610 residents across Damascus districts. Six first-order indices and one composite PPR index were constructed and evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha with item–total correlation analysis. Results demonstrate a stable multidimensional structure that integrates evaluative environmental conditions with relational processes, moving beyond emotion-dominant interpretations of attachment. The framework advances existing approaches by linking theoretical constructs to empirically tested measurement dimensions. While further validation in diverse contexts is required, the results indicate that the model provides a coherent and adaptable basis for assessing residential PPR in socio-culturally complex urban environments.
Yousef et al. (Fri,) studied this question.