The need for Arabic Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) has grown steadily alongside the expansion of digital content, while the linguistic complexity of Modern Standard Arabic and its diverse dialects introduces significant challenges. However, progress in the field remains constrained by methodological fragmentation, inconsistent task definitions, heterogeneous datasets, and non-standardized evaluation practices. Based on a systematic analysis of 57 studies, this work presents an analytical and interpretive review that moves beyond performance-oriented surveys to examine the methodological foundations of Arabic ABSA research. The review follows a rigorous and transparent study selection process and applies a structured analytical framework to analyze task formulations, dataset characteristics, modeling approaches and evaluation strategies. Our findings reveal persistent challenges, including ambiguous aspect definitions, insufficiently documented annotation protocols, structural annotation biases, and limited robustness across domains and dialects. A heavy reliance on Transformer-based architectures and new Arabic foundation models can create an illusion of progress. Researchers often evaluate these models on small and homogeneous datasets. Consequently, strong in-domain performance obscures limited cross-domain and cross-dialectal generalizability. This study concludes by outlining actionable research directions, emphasizing clearer task standardization, more rigorous annotation guidelines, unified evaluation, and broader dialectal coverage to enhance reproducibility and scalability in Arabic ABSA systems.
Youseef et al. (Sun,) studied this question.