PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Cancers1 citationsOpen Access

Sex as a Contextual Modifier in Colorectal Cancer: Integrating Tumor Sidedness, Molecular Subtype, Immune Ecology, and Early-Onset Disease

BLBing LiangXLXinlin LiuTZTingting Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how sex modifies colorectal cancer characteristics by integrating various biological factors.
  • Review of existing literature on colorectal cancer and sex differences
  • Analysis of tumor sidedness, molecular subtypes, and immune contexts
  • Discussion of mechanistic studies in defined clinical niches
  • Women show a higher prevalence of right-sided and mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.
  • Men are more frequently diagnosed with distal colorectal cancer and higher disease burden.
  • Sex-related differences also include distinct molecular pathways and immune responses.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) shows consistent sex-related differences in incidence, anatomic distribution, molecular subtype, immune context, and clinical outcome. However, these differences are often discussed through broad parallel themes such as hormones, genetics, or the microbiome, rather than through the biological settings in which sex meaningfully modifies tumor behavior. This review argues that sex is most informative in CRC when treated as a contextual modifier whose relevance emerges only after integrating tumor sidedness, mismatch repair status, oncogenic background, immune ecology, and age at onset. The clearest signals arise from interaction-based contexts, particularly when sex is interpreted together with tumor sidedness and dMMR/MSI-H or BRAF-linked disease states. Current evidence indicates that women are enriched for proximal or right-sided, microsatellite instability-high, mismatch repair-deficient, CpG island methylator phenotype-high, and BRAF-associated CRC, whereas men more often present with distal disease and a higher overall burden. Mechanistic studies further show that sex-related differences extend beyond hormone exposure to include KRAS–STAT4–KDM5D signaling, site-specific immune-checkpoint programs, metabolic phenotypes, epigenetic biomarker variation, and microbiota–hormone crosstalk. These effects are most evident in defined clinical niches, particularly right-sided CRC, mismatch repair-deficient disease, BRAF-mutated metastatic CRC, and early-onset CRC. A sex-aware, subtype-aware, and location-aware framework therefore offers a more clinically useful interpretation of CRC heterogeneity than descriptive male-versus-female comparisons alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9ba6b85696592c86eca08https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081309
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper