Accurate classification of peripheral blood cell types from microscopy images can support automated hematology workflows by reducing manual review burden and improving consistency. However, fine-grained recognition remains challenging due to strong inter-class similarity, intra-class morphological variability, and confounding cytoplasmic texture patterns that blur decision boundaries among related cell types. We propose SwinDiNO-AFNet for eight-class classification of basophil, eosinophil, erythroblast, immature granulocyte (IG), lymphocyte, monocyte, neutrophil, and platelet. SwinDiNO-AFNet is a dual-path hybrid that fuses hierarchical window-based features from a Swin Transformer with global representations from a pretrained DINOv2 vision transformer used strictly as a feature extractor. The flattened Swin and pooled DINOv2 features are concatenated and refined through a channel attention module to obtain attention-weighted fusion before the final classifier. To ensure rigorous evaluation, the training pipeline enforces leakage control via perceptual-hash based near-duplicate removal before fold creation, with consistent RGB enforcement, 224 × 224 resizing, ImageNet normalization, and train-only augmentation and robustness noise applied exclusively within training folds. Under leakage-safe stratified fivefold cross-validation, SwinDiNO-AFNet achieves 98.61 ± 0.21% validation accuracy with 98.46% macro-F1, and statistical testing (Welch with Holm adjustment) supports improvements over multiple baseline backbones under the same protocol. Precision-recall analysis further indicates near-ceiling separability (micro-AUPRC 0.9979), while confusion matrix and Grad-CAM based error analysis show that remaining failures concentrate in morphologically ambiguous cases, including IG confusions toward granulocytic patterns. Overall, the results show that attention-guided fusion of complementary Swin and DINOv2 representations, combined with leakage-safe cross-validation and XAI-backed diagnostics, provides a strong solution for eight-class peripheral blood cell classification on the studied dataset.
Melon et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: