PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Early identification of emergency abdominal surgery candidates in the emergency department – a delphi study

DMDorte MelgaardJJJakob F. JørgensenTSThomas Stilling-Vinther

Key Result

A Delphi consensus process among 87 experts identified 11 clinical indicators, such as acute pain onset and repeated vomiting, for early identification of emergency abdominal surgery candidates.

Key Points

  • The aim was to identify clinical indicators that support timely recognition of patients needing emergency abdominal surgery.
  • Modified Delphi study with two rounds to achieve expert consensus on clinical indicators.
  • 87 surgeons and emergency physicians participated in round one, with 62 completing round two.
  • Participants rated and ranked predefined indicators based on their importance.
  • Consensus reached for 11 important indicators for identifying AHA patients on arrival in the ED.
  • Indicators include acute pain onset within minutes and a VAS pain score of 6–10.
  • No clear consensus emerged on the relative prioritization of these indicators.

Structured PICO

P
Population
87 experienced surgeons and emergency physicians from Denmark
I
Intervention
Modified Delphi consensus process (2 rounds)
O
Outcome
Identification of clinical indicators for early recognition of patients needing emergency abdominal surgery

A Delphi study identified 11 clinical indicators for early identification of patients requiring acute high-risk abdominal surgery in the ED, providing a foundation for future screening tools.

Limitations

  • Small sample size restricting the analysis of differences between surgeons and emergency physicians
  • Reliance on the authors' professional networks may have introduced selection bias
  • Potential overrepresentation of experts with more prominent or established careers
  • Small sample size restricting subgroup analysis
  • Selection bias due to reliance on authors' professional networks
  • Potential overrepresentation of more experienced professionals

Abstract

Acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. In the emergency department (ED), early identification of patients requiring AHA surgery remains challenging and is often based on non-standardized clinical judgment. This study aimed to identify clinical indicators that may support the timely recognition of patients in need of emergency abdominal surgery. A modified Delphi study was conducted to achieve expert consensus on early clinical indicators of AHA surgery. Two Delphi rounds were performed. In round one, experienced surgeons and emergency clinicians rated 30 predefined indicators as insignificant, less important, important, or very important. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of participants rating an indicator as important or very important. In round two, participants were asked to rank the importance of the indicators rated as “important” or “very important” in round one. A total of 87 surgeons and emergency physicians participated in round one, with 62 (71%) completing round two. Consensus was reached for 11 indicators considered important for identifying AHA patients on arrival in the ED, e.g. acute pain onset within minutes, VAS pain score 6–10, repeated vomiting, and absence of bowel movement within 24 h. In round two, clinicians ranked these indicators; however, no clear consensus emerged regarding their relative prioritisation. This Delphi study identified 11 clinically relevant indicators for the early identification of patients requiring AHA surgery in the ED. The study underscores the complexity of early recognition and supports the need for structured, data-informed screening tools to aid clinical decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Melgaard et al. (2026) studied Acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery (n=87). Delphi consensus process was evaluated on Consensus (≥75% agreement) on early clinical indicators for AHA surgery. A Delphi consensus process among 87 experts identified 11 clinical indicators, such as acute pain onset and repeated vomiting, for early identification of emergency abdominal surgery candidates.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabdf4a46254e215b3c0chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04058-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Developing a toolbox for identifying when to engage senior surgeons in emergency general surgery: A multicenter cohort study2020 · 8 citations
  2. 2Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery2007 · 96 citations
  3. 3Determinants of Delays in Non-traumatic Emergency Abdominal Surgeries: A Prospective Analysis2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Triage and Outcomes for a Whole Cohort of Patients Presenting for Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery Including the No-LAP Population: A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study2022 · 4 citations
  5. 5Predictive criteria for acute heart failure in emergency department patients with acute dyspnoea: the PREDICA study2019 · 18 citations