PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology204 citations

Doppler color flow “proximal isovelocity surface area” method for estimating volume flow rate: Effects of orifice shape and machine factors

View Full Paper
TUToshinori UtsunomiyaTOToshio OgawaRDRajen Doshi

Structured PICO

Does the hemi-elliptic model for PISA accurately estimate volume flow rate for noncircular orifices compared to a hemispheric model in vitro?

P
Population
In vitro flow experiments using orifices of various shapes (ellipse, square, triangle, star, rectangle) (n=226) and evaluating machine factors (n=83)
I
Intervention
Doppler color flow proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method using a hemi-elliptic model
C
Comparator
Hemispheric model for PISA shape, and actual flow rate
O
Outcome
Accuracy of volume flow rate calculation (average percent differences from actual flow rate)surrogate

A hemi-elliptic model for PISA provides more accurate volume flow rate estimates for noncircular orifices than a hemispheric model in vitro.

Abstract

Previously described Doppler color flow mapping methods for estimating the severity of valvular regurgitation have focused on the distal jet. In this study, a newer Doppler color flow technique, focusing on the flow proximal to an orifice, was used. This method identifies a proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) by displaying an aliasing interface. Volume flow rate (cm3/s) can be calculated as PISA (cm2) x aliasing velocity (cm/s). For planar circular orifices, a hemi-elliptic model accurately approximated the shape of PISA. Clinically, however, orifice shapes may be noncircular. In vitro flow experiments (n = 226) using orifices of various shapes (ellipse, square, triangle, star, rectangle) were performed. Volume flow rate calculated using a hemi-elliptic model for PISA was accurate, with average percent differences from actual flow rate = +4.3% for a square, -4.2% for a triangle, -4.7% for a star, -4.5% for an ellipse and -2.8% for a rectangle. However, average percent differences for calculated volume flow rates using a hemispheric model for PISA shape ranged from -11.6% (square) to -34.8% (rectangle). In addition, to evaluate whether PISA is influenced by machine factors, in vitro studies (n = 83) were performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Utsunomiya et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f56d219954c85918edcb20https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(91)90839-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper