PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Spontaneous dental implant macro-migration in low-density bone: An 8-year case report.

View Full Paper
CTChia‐Chin TsaiCYChieh‐An YiTCT W Chen

Key Points

  • To describe a rare case of spontaneous macro-migration of a dental implant in low-density bone and evaluate its long-term functional success.
  • A 53-year-old female required implant placement in the maxillary first molar site with low bone density.
  • Digital image registration quantified migration at 4 months, 8 months, and 8 years after placement.
  • Confirmed a 12.8° mesial macro-migration within the first 4 months, with initial stability increasing (ISQ 63-78).
  • At 8 years, the implant maintained functionally stable status with minimal marginal bone loss.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant migration is an uncommon phenomenon defined as a change in the positional axis of a stable implant. This report describes a rare case of spontaneous macro-migration occurring during the healing phase in a site with poor bone density and evaluates its 8-year functional success. METHODS: A 53-year-old female required implant placement in the maxillary left first molar (Universal tooth #14) site with low bone density (residual bone height: 4.2-5 mm). Following sinus floor elevation using particulate bone grafting, a 4 mm × 13 mm implant was placed (insertion torque: 35 Ncm; initial implant stability quotient ISQ: 63). Digital image registration utilizing a rigid-body transformation algorithm was employed to quantify migration at 4 months, 8 months, and 8 years. RESULTS: Digital analysis confirmed a 12.8° mesial macro-migration within the first 4 months. Despite the shift, stability increased biologically (ISQ 63-78). A 15° angled abutment was used for prosthetic correction. At 8 years, the implant remained functionally stable with intact three-dimensional bone encapsulation on cone-beam computed tomography and minimal marginal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous migration in low-density bone before graft maturation does not necessarily preclude successful osseointegration. Long-term stability can be achieved through prosthetic intervention. KEY POINTS: Clinical phenomenon: Spontaneous implant macro-migration can occur in low-density (Type IV) bone during the submerged healing phase, particularly when associated with immature particulate bone grafts. Diagnostic tool: Digital image registration utilizing open-source software is an effective method for clinicians to objectively quantify positional shifts and differentiate adaptive migration from pathological displacement. Treatment outcome: Dental implants undergoing significant spontaneous migration (up to 12.8°) can achieve successful osseointegration and 8-year functional stability when managed with appropriate prosthetic compensation using angled abutments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f594ca71405d493afffa83https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accidental migration of dental implants: Two unique cases and their management2026
  2. 2The Causes of Dental Implant Migration into the Maxillary Sinus: A Case Series Study from 25 Years of Experience.2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Immediate Implant Placement in the Mandibular Molar Septum Using Osseodensification: A Case Report with 4-Year Follow-Up2026
  4. 4Delayed Implant Fixture Displacement into the Maxillary Sinus Five Years Post-Loading: Unraveling the Causes - A Case Report2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Implant fixture displacement into focal osteoporotic bone marrow defects in the posterior mandible: A report of three cases2026