This paper presents a comparative analysis of the government’s roles in promoting strong media systems through transparency and accountability in three contrasting national contexts: the United States, Nigeria, and China. Grounded in normative press theories (libertarian, social responsibility, and authoritarian), the paper explores how media systems function within different political environments and how they either support or suppress the watchdog role of journalism. The study adopts a qualitative research design grounded in the interpretivist paradigm, relying on secondary data to examine media-state relations across different political systems, drawing on academic literature, legal documents, and institutional reports. Findings reveal that while journalism in the United States of America thrives under a liberal democratic framework, Nigeria’s media operate within a fragile democracy marked by systemic challenges. In China, state-controlled media suppress opposition and prioritise party messaging, severely limiting journalistic independence. The study concludes that strong legal protections, political will, and institutional support are essential for journalism to fulfill its governance role. Recommendations are offered to strengthen media institutions, protect journalists, and encourage press freedom worldwide.
Ade-Johnson et al. (Thu,) studied this question.