Climate-driven heat and water stress are increasingly compromising rainfed maize yields in transition zones, with significant implications for global food security. While continental-scale models of crop suitability exist, they often fail to capture the high-resolution heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes or distinguish between irrigated and rainfed systems in semi-arid regions. This study models the current and future suitability of rainfed maize in Kansas, USA, using a Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) approach. To accurately isolate biophysical constraints, we employed a novel data-filtering workflow using the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) and Landsat-based Annual Irrigated Datasets (LANID) to train the model exclusively on rainfed occurrences. We projected suitability shifts for the mid- (2041–2070) and end-of-century (2071–2100) periods under two CMIP6 Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5), using high-resolution CHELSA bioclimatic variables. The model, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.73 and validated against 30 years of historical USDA production records, reveals a distinct spatial contraction of areas climatically suitable for growing maize. Projections indicate a significant decline in suitability across Western and Central Kansas driven by rising temperatures and precipitation variability, with the most highly suitable optimal habitats projected to decline by approximately 90% by mid-century. These findings quantify mounting climate impacts on maize-growing areas of the Great Plains and provide spatially explicit baselines for the development of regional adaptation strategies and groundwater conservation policies.
Monavarian et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: