PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 7, 2008Clinical Chemistry266 citationsOpen Access

Short- and Long-Term Biological Variation in Cardiac Troponin I Measured with a High-Sensitivity Assay: Implications for Clinical Practice

AWAlan H.B. WuQLQuynh Anh LuJTJohn A. Todd

Structured PICO

P
Population
12 healthy volunteers for short-term assessment and 17 healthy individuals for long-term assessment
I
Intervention
Serial measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) using a high-sensitivity assay (detection limit, 0.2 ng/L)
O
Outcome
Biological variation of cTnI including analytical, intraindividual, interindividual, and total CVs, index of individuality (II), and reference change values (RCVs)surrogate

The low index of individuality for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I indicates that tracking serial changes in individual patients is more useful than using population-based reference intervals.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The improved detection limit and precision in new-generation commercial assays for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) have lowered the 99th-percentile cutoff value, yielding higher frequencies of positive test results. Because serial testing is important in interpreting low concentrations, we evaluated the biological variation of cTnI in both the short (hours) and long (weeks) terms and determined reference change values (RCVs) and the index of individuality (II) for cTnI. METHODS: To assess short- and long-term variation, we collected blood from 12 healthy volunteers hourly for 4 h and from 17 healthy individuals once every other week for 8 weeks, measured cTnI with a high-sensitivity assay (detection limit, 0.2 ng/L), and computed analytical, intraindividual, interindividual, and total CVs (CV(A), CV(I), CV(G), and CV(T), respectively; CV(T) = CV(A) + CV(I) + CV(G)) as well as the II. Because of the slight right-skewness of the data, RCVs were calculated with a lognormal approach. RESULTS: Within-day CV(A), CV(I), and CV(G) values were 8.3%, 9.7%, and 57%, respectively; the corresponding between-day values were 15%, 14%, and 63%. Within- and between-day IIs were 0.21 and 0.39, respectively. Lognormal within-day RCVs were 46% and -32%, respectively; the corresponding between-day values were 81% and -45%. CONCLUSIONS: The low II indicates that population-based reference intervals are less useful for interpreting cTnI values than following serial changes in values in individual patients. This criterion is particularly important for interpreting results from patients who show cTnI increases at low concentrations measured with very high-sensitivity assays, from patients presenting with chest pain (short term), and for evaluating drugs for cardiotoxicity (long term).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fab3d679c9fe70ce3f568bhttps://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107391
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Troponins for predicting cardiotoxicity from cancer therapy2000 · 20 citations
  2. 2Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction2007 · 3,136 citations
  3. 3Performance Characteristics of 6 Third-Generation Assays for Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone2005 · 1 citations
  4. 4Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina2000 · 75 citations
  5. 5The clinical need for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for acute coronary syndromes and the role for serial testing2007 · 160 citations