PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026Pediatric Neurology0 citationsOpen Access

A randomized, double-blind, pilot study of N-acetylcysteine for motor and cognitive symptoms in youth with Neurofibromatosis type 1

View Full Paper
DGDonald L. GilbertCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterLALindsey Aschbacher‐SmithCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterKMKarlee Y. MigneaultCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of N-acetylcysteine on motor and cognitive symptoms in youth with Neurofibromatosis type 1.
  • Conducted a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
  • Included 25 youth aged 8-16 with Neurofibromatosis type 1
  • Assessed motor and cognitive function, safety, and tolerability of N-acetylcysteine
  • No significant difference in motor function scores between N-acetylcysteine and placebo groups
  • Cognitive function did not show improvement in secondary outcomes
  • N-acetylcysteine was generally well tolerated with some behavioral concerns

Abstract

Background: Children and youth with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) commonly experience motor, behavioral, and cognitive problems.Promising findings from an NF1 mouse model suggested that the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) might address underlying mechanistic deficits. Methods:We conducted a 12-week (8-week treatment, 4-week washout), double-blind, placebocontrolled randomized trial of NAC in 8-16-year-olds with NF1.We screened 481 children, identified 203 eligible, and randomized 25; 23 received at least one dose (10 NAC at ~70 mg/kg/day; 13 placebo).Outcomes were safety, tolerability, motor function (primary: Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs), cognitive function (secondary: Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptom scores and executive function measures), and exploratory biomarkers (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy measures).Results: In the modified intention to treat analysis, no significant difference in PANESS was observed between groups.In completer-analyses, NAC did not improve any secondary or exploratory outcome at 8 weeks.NAC was generally well tolerated, although two participants were withdrawn by parents because of worsening behavior.Test-retest reliability of scales, measures, and biomarkers over 12 weeks was generally moderate.Conclusions: NAC was generally well tolerated but did not improve motor or behavioral outcomes in youth with NF1.Larger, longer trials with preceding dose-escalation and target-engagement studies are needed to evaluate new therapies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilbert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbf004164b5133a91a44f0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2026.04.024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Lamotrigine for cognitive deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: A phase II randomized placebo‐controlled trial2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2The Central Nervous System Modulatory Activities of N-Acetylcysteine: A Synthesis of Two Decades of Evidence2025 · 12 citations
  3. 3N‐acetylcysteine as a new prominent approach for treating psychiatric disorders2021 · 64 citations
  4. 4Effectiveness of N -acetylcysteine in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2020 · 73 citations
  5. 5Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition2004 · 359 citations