PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1998Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation190 citationsOpen Access

Meta-analysis. Update on reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension (a meta-analysis of all randomized double-blind studies until December 1996)

View Full Paper
RSR. SchmiederMSMarkus P. SchlaichAKArnfried U. Klingbeil

Key Points

  • This meta-analysis aims to update the understanding of how different antihypertensive drugs affect left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.
  • Meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials published until December 1996.

Structured PICO

Do different classes of antihypertensive drugs reduce left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension?

P
Population
1,715 patients with essential hypertension from 50 randomized double-blind studies (13 placebo arms, n=165; 89 active treatment arms, n=1550)
I
Intervention
Antihypertensive therapy (ACE-inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, or diuretics)
C
Comparator
Placebo or other antihypertensive drug classes
O
Outcome
Reduction of left ventricular masssurrogate

ACE-inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are more effective than beta-blockers in reducing left ventricular mass in patients with essential hypertension.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the ability of different antihypertensive drugs to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Relevant medical databases including MEDLINE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, EMBASE, and SCISEARCH as well as review articles to December 1996. STUDY SELECTION: Meta-analysis of all published articles including only double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical studies with parallel-group design. DATA EXTRACTION: Literature search and data extraction according to a prefixed scheme performed independently by two investigators. The primary parameter was reduction of left ventricular mass by antihypertensive therapy with placebo, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or ACE-inhibitors. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifty studies published till the end of December 1996 were identified. They comprised a total of 1715 patients in 13 placebo (n=165, age: 50+/-3 years) and 89 active treatment arms (n=1550, age: 56+/-10 years) respectively. Overall, for active treatment left ventricular mass index was the more reduced the greater the decrease in systolic blood pressure, (r=0.27; P<0.05), the longer the duration of therapy (r=0.36; P<0.001), and the higher the pretreatment value of left ventricular mass index (r= 0.53; P<0.001). Left ventricular mass index was decreased by 12% with ACE-inhibitors (95% CI: 9.0-14.5%), by 11% with calcium channel blockers (95% CI: 7.8-13.7%), by 5% with beta-blockers (95% CI: 1.2-7.3%) and by 8% with diuretics (95% CI: 3.9-11.1%) (overall P<0.01). Subsequent tests revealed that ACE-inhibitors and calcium channel blockers were more effective than beta-blockers in reducing left ventricular mass index (P<0.05). Similar differences between drug classes were found with regard to effect on left ventricular wall thickness (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in systolic blood pressure, duration of antihypertensive therapy, degree of pretreatment left ventricular hypertrophy and antihypertensive drug class determined the reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy. ACE-inhibitors and calcium channel blockers were more potent in reducing left ventricular mass than beta-blockers, with diuretics in the intermediate range.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmieder et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd29ba30a474415f89e1f9https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/13.3.564
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper