PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Damage and deterioration mechanism of marl under acidic erosion and dry-wet cycles: A case of Wuxia, Three Gorges Reservoir area

FZFuchuan ZhouDZDandan ZuoXLXinrong Liu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the damage and deterioration mechanisms of marl in acidic environments and varying moisture conditions.
  • Conducted laboratory acid corrosion and wet-dry cyclic tests on marl samples from the Wuxia section.
  • Measured mass loss rate, porosity changes, and uniaxial compressive strength after varying pH levels and cycles.
  • Performed microscopic analysis to observe pore and crack formations.
  • Mass loss rates varied from 0.006% to 0.066% depending on pH and cycle count.
  • Average porosity increased by 0.104% at pH 3, with microscopic increases in pore volume and crack length.
  • Uniaxial compressive strength reduced by 5.65% to 28.25% after 15 cycles, indicating significant deterioration.

Abstract

In view of the geological disasters caused by the deterioration of rock mass in the fluctuation zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, the marl of the Wuxia section was selected as the object, and laboratory acid corrosion and wet-dry cyclic tests were conducted to reveal the damage and deterioration mechanism of marl in the fluctuation zone with acidic environment. The results show that: (1) When the pH was 3, 5 and 7, the mass loss rate was 0.019%~0.066%, 0.010%~0.029% and 0.006%~0.017% with 5 ~ 15 circles, respectively. (2) When the pH values were 3, 5 and 7, after 15-time acidic erosion and dry-wet cycles, the average porosity increment of the samples was 0.104%, 0.093% and 0.092%, respectively, and the initial porositywas found to influence the rate of porosity increase during the early stage of the experiment. (3) At the microscopic level, the pore volume and crack length were increased, and the number of pores and cracks increased under the scanning election microscope analysis, which revealed the damage and deterioration mechanism of samples. (4) The uniaxial compressive test of the sample was inversely proportional to the number of acidic erosion and dry-wet cycles. At pH values of 3, 5, and 7, the reduction rate of rock uniaxial compressive strength ranged from 5.65% to 28.25% after 5, 10, and 15 cycles of acid corrosion-drying-wetting, respectively. (5) The variation range of the mass loss rate, pore growth rate and the uniaxial compressive strength reduction rate of rock samples were all initially slow, later fast and then slow, and finally tended to be stable. (6) The error between the result of calculation with uniaxial compressive strength fitting formula and the test is less than 10%, which could prove the fit is reasonable, universally. The research could provide theoretical support for unstable rocks mass of geological disasters in the Three Gorges Reservoir area.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e5cbfa21ec5bbf06960https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50966-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental evaluation of multiscale damage evolution in fissured limestone under different wet–dry cycles and axial stress2026
  2. 2Triaxial creep characteristics and microstructure of red sandstone under acidic dry-wet cycles2025
  3. 3Multiscale damage mechanisms of limestone under acid, alkali, and cyclic conditions2026
  4. 4An experimental investigation on the damage mechanisms of red glutenite in the Mount Wuyi cultural and natural heritage site subject to acid rain and wet-dry cycles: a macro-to-micro approach2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Dynamic behavior and constitutive model of marble subjected to wet-dry cycling2025